You Be the Judge!

Reports are designed for you to draw your own conclusions based on the

• Evidence Provided

• Cited Law, Guidelines, or Professional Ethics (Linked if Possible)

Rep•In Reports Meet the Highest Possible Ethical Standards

Based on Reputable Institutions Such As:

  • Washington Post

  • Wall Street Journal

  • New York Times,

  • Economist and other Credible News Insitutions

Rep•In Reports

  • Our Intention is Clear: We aim to provoke improvements that serve other vulnerable adults and people with disabilities

  • We State the Truth Factually with Evidence

  • Parties Cited Are Informed From the Start that Their Information is Public Record

  • Written Accomodations Requirements are shared that explicitly state all communications are Public Record and may be Shared Publicly

  • Individual Naming Standards require that the individual named is acting in a professional role

  • Citations of Applicable Laws, Professional Guidelines, and Published Ethics are referenced (and linked if possible)

  • Interpretation is limited to an optional Statement of Harm (usually one paragraphs) added to a report to explain the impact. If the Statement of Harm makes claims beyond the facts, it is clearly stated.

  • We Believe —

    TRUTH is the Foundation for Justice.

    ‘Justice is what love looks like on the outside.’

    — Cornel West

Rep•In Reports document verified incidents, official responses, and patterns of institutional failure.

Each report exists to document a public record of events that otherwise remain hidden or unacknowledged, ensuring transparency, accuracy, and reform.

Each topic contains its own set of reports and evidence entries

Every published report is cross-checked against recorded communications, public-record requests, and surveillance evidence. Corrections are posted transparently when new verified data becomes available

To read or verify source materials, open Reports-Menu and choose a topic. Each report folder contains its own timeline, correspondence, and evidence archive.

Ethical Standards & Verification

Rep•In maintains a documented verification policy modeled on investigative-journalism and public-record standards.

Each report cites source types, evidence date, and verification status.

Materials are published in good faith for transparency and accountability, and corrections or redactions are clearly dated.

Current reports highlight these institutional failures:

  • MN Adult Protection Reporting Service (MAARC) Refuses to Provide Protections to Vulnerable Adult

  • Appeals Division of MN Department of Human Services Fails to Follow Stated Guidelines

  • Loring Green East Association Legal Unsubstantiated Fines, Harassment, and Dishonest Legal Statements

  • Assault, Torture, Robbery, Fraud and Abuse of a Vulnerable Adult Failures on the Part of Multiple Agencies and Professionals

Report Spotlight — April 15 Assault

A documented overnight assault and robbery causing repeated concussion, property loss exceeding $24,000, and ongoing neurological injury.

The case involves delayed emergency response, mishandled evidence, and subsequent financial-fraud attempts.!

To date, over six months later, no support or help has been offered or provided.

Make it stand out.

It all begins with an idea. Maybe you want to launch a business. Maybe you want to turn a hobby into something more. Or maybe you have a creative project to share with the world. Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.

Don’t worry about sounding professional. Sound like you. There are over 1.5 billion websites out there, but your story is what’s going to separate this one from the rest. If you read the words back and don’t hear your own voice in your head, that’s a good sign you still have more work to do.