Assault - Institutional Failures Summary
Every system—from law enforcement to medical to county protection—failed to act in a timely or appropriate manner.
The failures compound and continue unabated and without remorse.
Despite multiple 911 calls, no ambulance ever entered the unit.
Police officers arrived hours later but failed to arrest the assailants, collect evidence, or provide the legally required victim information card. They failed to file a report, did not identify the assailants, and allowed them to leave with my billfold, keys, cash, and property.
After the police left, I passed out from head trauma. Because the assailants had my keys, I had to erect a barricade at the front door to prevent their return. One recovered security video later suggested they may have re-entered the unit while I was unconscious.
The hospital police report, later obtained, was entirely redacted. The forensic nurse exam—often copied into the police report—also omitted the second assailant and key injuries.
An investigator, reportedly Lt. David, was assigned but never contacted me, reviewed footage, or initiated any investigatory actions. He failed to collect and evaluate multiple forms of evidence, including drug paraphernalia discovered blocking the guest toilet in a failed disposal attempt.
The investigator never:
• Collected or reviewed condo building security video or interviewed on-duty security staff.
• Reviewed my 45+ internal security videos, which had been successfully activated around the time of the first 911 call.
• Collected clothing or documents left by the assailants.A personal protection order was filed and approved for one identified assailant, but it was never served.
Because police failed to identify the second assailant, I could not include him in any protection order. I had his phone number from text messages sent the next day, but only the number—no name. The investigator could have easily obtained this information but never did.
Condo 24-hour security, under association guidelines, is required to prohibit entry to anyone not approved by the homeowner. There are no call records showing that the security staff contacted me before allowing entry.
Condo association security also failed to identify the assailant by name, as required by policy, before letting him in.
The Board of Directors continues to refuse release of information or entry footage, despite the constant camera coverage at the main entrance.
Two-Hour Minneapolis Police Response, Ambulance Never Arrives Despite Multiple Calls to 911
The failures were exacerbated by ongoing refusals to share reports, collect evidence, release records, transcripts, or body-cam video or respond to requests.
Despite repeated 911 calls reporting an ongoing assault and medical emergency, police did not arrive for over two hours and failed to file required documentation. No legally required “blue card” identification was issued, no ambulance entered the residence, and critical evidence was ignored.
Ongoing data requests are routinely returned with all content redacted. Because officers never filed an initial report, the Minneapolis Police Department will not acknowledge whether body-cam video exists. The emergency-room report has also never been updated, even as my memory improved during recovery from diagnosed traumatic brain injuries and new video evidence clarified events.
No investigator has ever followed up since the initial emergency-room interaction. No attempt was made to collect additional evidence such as surveillance video or homeowners-association footage. Even drug paraphernalia that the assailants attempted to dispose of—clogging the guest bathroom toilet—was never collected or analyzed.
Assault Institutional Failures
Related Evidence & Posts
(To be linked as each supporting document or post is added.)
• 911 Call Transcript — April 15, 2025
• Body Cam Request and Data Redactions
• Forensic Exam and Hospital Report Omissions
• Condo Security and Access Logs Failure
This report details violations of Minnesota’s Vulnerable Adult Act and data-practices obligations under Minn. Stat. § 13.82.
Relevant Laws & Statutes, Regulatory Rules, Professional Standards & Guidance Documents
Some references relevant to this report are cited by the Reporting Team.
[Citation Title: Example Law/Statute]
[State or Federal Statute reference § … —
Read the [Statute Title] ⧉
Overview: [Brief overview of the statute’s purpose.]
Relevance: [Why this statute is relevant to your topic.]
[Citation Title: Example Admin Rule]
[Agency Rule reference § … —
View Official Rules ⧉
Overview: [Brief description of what the regulation covers.]
Relevance: [Why this regulation applies in your context.]
[Citation Title: Example Professional Guideline]
[Organization Name Guidance –
Read the Guidance Document ⧉
Overview: [Brief description of the guideline’s content or purpose.]
Relevance: [Why this guideline is relevant to your subject.]